I wish I had taken notes on this idiot to knock him down point by point. I guess I do have to give the guy some credit for possibly getting some things right. But its hard to be interested in any of that when you have to sit through his revisionist history.
The part of Meet the Press that really got to me was Woodward putting all the blame on the President for divisiveness when San Fran Nan came to him and supposedly tried to work with him and the President basically said that his mind was made up. Listen Bob, there are two glaring facts here bud. Number one, Pelosi is a left-wing extremist and, two, the President was right about the surge. So, what exactly was the President suppose to work on with this ant-war left-coast bitch? Hmmm? Well, I guess that doesn’t matter to a guy with a liberal agenda, now, does it Bobby. In fact, I’m sure none of the incessant attacks on the President which started right after 9/11 mean much of anything to you, right, jerkoff? Ok, for a little history lesson little Bobby, pick up David Horowitz’s book “Party of Defeat” and try to squeeze a novel thought into that liberal wasteland between your ears.






Well this is an old blog post, but I found it randomly through Google so here’s a response in defense of Ron Paul’s position.
According to this article from Fox News - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,85446,00.html
“…the presence of American forces here has long been an irritant for Saudi rulers facing strong anti-American sentiment among a growing and increasingly restive population. Fifteen of the 19 alleged Sept. 11 hijackers were Saudis, and Saudi-born Osama bin Laden cites the U.S. military presence in his homeland as a reason for his hatred of America.”
Even if our troops were there at the invitation of the Saudi government, it well-known that their government does not represent the will of the people. Apparently Bin Laden perceived our presence there as an occupation.
Also, Ron Paul votes against every appropriations bill. However, because his district is paying loads of taxes, just like every other district, it is Ron Paul’s duty to represent his constituents and try to get some of that money back in the form of earmarks. If Ron Paul did not submit the earmarks, that money, which has already been appropriated, would be taken by an earmark for another district or just spent without oversight by the Executive branch.