OK, so he didn’t say that he is an ant-Semite. I’m not sure where to start with this guy. He basically thinks we should just let all hell break loose in the Middle East. This guy has a really warped mind. I’ve heard him make statements about wiping people out that would have made Stalin proud. He definitely has a chip on his shoulder when it comes to Israel. You can see the anger in his demeanor when the subject comes up. This guy really is a weasel in so many ways. He has this arrogant way of calling everyone “sir” that really gets on my nerves. I just hope hope most people understand that the road this man thinks we should take is the road to hell. If we don’t back up the Israel against the genocidal Iranians, then we have no doubt learned nothing from history. And deserve reap all of the consequences.

O’reilly just had left-wing whack-job Ellis Hennican on. It was a continuation of the pounding that O’reilly gave Hennican last week on the waterboarding issue, minus most of the verbal heat. Still O’reilly really showed the kind of lunacy that the left and the Democrat party is dealing in these days.

O’reilly made the comparison, which I have heard others make, of the fact that while Obama is against waterboarding, he is at the same time blowing up innocent people in Pakistan along with the terrorists that are being targeted. Hennican came back with some mealymouthed B.S. about how these are difficult moral issues, but apparently to morons such as himself there is much less moral ambiguity to dunking a few maniacal terrorist or to the thousands of deaths that could have occured if said dunking hadn’t taken place. I.E., dunking terrorists bad, dead Americans good. I think all of this moral relativism being displayed by the Left is the centerpiece of the liberal cult I believe this group has grown into. Ann Coulter was the first person I know of to write this story up and publish it in her book Godless. I still haven’t gotten around to reading Godless. i tried once, but the introduction in the book was all over the place and I read a review later on that said once you get past the Introduction, the book takes off gloves and we finally get no-holds barred Coulter.

So, back to my point, that Liberalism has grown into a cult. Let’s just take the issue of abortion. Abortion is one of the holy grails of Liberalism. As I’ve grown older I’ve truly come to revile abortion for the evil that it is. But, if Liberals were honest, they would say that they see nothing evil about abortion. Some would be, most of the so-called Catholic Dems who support it would never be honest about it. I’ll never be able to understand why liberals are so married to this issue. There is no real stigma attached to a woman having a child out of wedlock in this day and age. Certainly nothing like it was before abortion became the law of the land. And so, there can only be one explanation for it. Convenience. Yeah, right. Convenience? I can’t really even to begin to fathom how libs can, in their own minds, manipulates the facts and come to the conclusion that adoption shouldn’t be the number one option for pregnant mothers. This all about convenience. Because it allows these woman, who are for the most part simply irresponsible people, to not make the tough choice and give their child up for adoption. I think another reason that Liberals see little if anything wrong with abortion is Evolution. Let’s face it, if we are only hairless apes, and we are related by blood to every living creature on the earth, then it isn’t much of a stretch to go from believing life is sacred to believing babies are disposable.

Evolution is the second holy grail of liberalism. I can’t say that I’ve fully understand this issue. I’d say that most of the people who say they are one hundred percent convinced on this issue don’t know what they are talking about. I am only convinced of this: That humans are not the product of evolution. Animals may or may not be another story. The Bible is clear that there was an Adam and Eve and they sinned. If there wasn’t and they didn’t then the Bible is simply a bunch of lies. Christ never would have had to come back and die for our sins. Either that or he died for ever living creature on the face of the earth. Oh, yeah. That makes sense. It probably would make to sense… To a liberal.

O’reilly just had left-wing whack-job Ellis Hennican on. It was a continuation of the pounding that O’reilly gave Hennican last week on the waterboarding issue, minus most of the verbal heat. Still O’reilly really showed the kind of lunacy that the left and the Democrat party is dealing in these days.

O’reilly made the comparison, which I have heard others make, of the fact that while Obama is against waterboarding, he is at the same time blowing up innocent people in Pakistan along with the terrorists that are being targeted. Hennican came back with some mealymouthed B.S. about how these are difficult moral issues, but apparently to morons such as himself there is much less moral ambiguity to dunking a few maniacal terrorist or to the thousands of deaths that could have occured if said dunking hadn’t taken place. I.E., dunking terrorists bad, dead Americans good. I think all of this moral relativism being displayed by the Left is the centerpiece of the liberal cult I believe this group has grown into. Ann Coulter was the first person I know of to write this story up and publish it in her book Godless. I still haven’t gotten around to reading Godless. i tried once, but the introduction in the book was all over the place and I read a review later on that said once you get past the Introduction, the book takes off gloves and we finally get no-holds barred Coulter.

So, back to my point, that Liberalism has grown into a cult. Let’s just take the issue of abortion. Abortion is one of the holy grails of Liberalism. As I’ve grown older I’ve truly come to revile abortion for the evil that it is. But, if Liberals were honest, they would say that they see nothing evil about abortion. Some would be, most of the so-called Catholic Dems who support it would never be honest about it. I’ll never be able to understand why liberals are so married to this issue. There is no real stigma attached to a woman having a child out of wedlock in this day and age. Certainly nothing like it was before abortion became the law of the land. And so, there can only be one explanation for it. Convenience. Yeah, right. Convenience? I can’t really even to begin to fathom how libs can, in their own minds, manipulates the facts and come to the conclusion that adoption shouldn’t be the number one option for pregnant mothers. This all about convenience. Because it allows these woman, who are for the most part simply irresponsible people, to not make the tough choice and give their child up for adoption. I think another reason that Liberals see little if anything wrong with abortion is Evolution. Let’s face it, if we are only hairless apes, and we are related by blood to every living creature on the earth, then it isn’t much of a stretch to go from believing life is sacred to believing babies are disposable.

Evolution is the second holy grail of liberalism. I can’t say that I’ve fully understand this issue. I’d say that most of the people who say they are one hundred percent convinced on this issue don’t know what they are talking about. I am only convinced of this: That humans are not the product of evolution. Animals may or may not be another story. The Bible is clear that there was an Adam and Eve and they sinned. If there wasn’t and they didn’t then the Bible is simply a bunch of lies. Christ never would have had to come back and die for our sins. Either that or he died for ever living creature on the face of the earth. Oh, yeah. That makes sense. It probably would make to sense… To a liberal.